W4WDA Forums

Discussion board for Wisconsin 4 Wheel Drive Association. Members include clubs from the state of Wisconsin
Welcome to W4WDA Forums Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Motorized Recreation Area Notes

Last post 08-12-2008, 2:16 PM by Mud-Dawg. 0 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-12-2008, 2:16 PM 548

    Motorized Recreation Area Notes

    I received this from Luana she asked me to post it on here so everyone could see what is happening.

    Motorized Recreation Area

    Focus Group on User Preferences
    June 24, 2008
    Chalet at Granite Peak
    Wausau, WI



    Agenda

    1.   Introductions. In Attendance (colors coded for organization’s comments):

    Blue   Wisconsin All-Terrain Vehicle Association (WATVA):
     Randy Harden, Rob McConnell, Hank Wozniel

    Red   Wisconsin Off-Highway Vehicle Association (WOHVA)
    John Schnorr, James Maze

    Purple   Wisconsin Off-Highway Motorcycle Association (WOHMA)
    Alex Bub, Becky Hayes

    Orange   Wisconsin Observed Trials Association (WOTA)
    Dave Schigoda

    Green   Wisconsin 4-Wheel Drive Association (W4WDA)
    Luana Schneider, Corey Nimmo

    Brown   Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
    Mark Aquino, Jeff Prey, Brigit Brown, Peter Biermeier
       

    2.   Meeting format and background
    3.   MRA planning efforts to date
    4.   Review of existing studies

    WATVA
    CFA(DNR) ~ 7-9  years old.
    Updated with tourism
    2 years ago WATVA survey (asked a variety of Questions including gas tax.  – more specific (e.g. travel distance)
    TPA doing survey on interaction b/w UTV & ATV

    WOHVA
    Short survey. Asked y/n to registration program.  ~1300 responses

    WOHMA
    Will do research

    W4WDA
    Favorable (to motorized park) no formal research.

    WOTA
    Trails not providing desired experience


    5.   Query of users on equipment design, specs and capabilities

    WATVA
    LUV – 62-65 Outside of wheel to …
    98 inch length
    1,999 pound limit
    900 pound over
    Factory box
    4-6 low pressure tires
    800 cc engine
    Spark arr.
    96 dbL
    No people limit but rule
    30-40 mph avg/max speed (no speed limit)

    ATV – See legal definition (48 inch may soon be gone)
       Trends up to 1000 cc
       Longer wheel base

    WOHMA
    32 inch cleared width
    12 inch tread width
    Wide variety
    80 pound (little kids)
    500 pounds (big dual sport bikes)
    Wheel base (center to center I think this should be 50 to 62 inch wheel base – I’d delete the reference to 20 inches because I believe that was related to rim diameter which is discussed immediately below (Mark Aquino) – 50 cc ~20 inches to big/dual 62 inches)
    Wheel diameter R/M nm 8 inches – 21 inches
    Spark arrest
    Competition motorcross bike likely to Not have spark arrestor (need to get info out ahead to users)
    Types of bikes
    Street legal dual sport150 -1200 cc, 4 strokes
    Non street legal (play) bike  (also not race bike)  Kids 50-650 cc
    Speed, Kids 5 mph (less with training wheels),
    short bursts up to 70 mph
    average speed 18 mph
    96 dbA
    Single track through woods – one way preferred.  Otherwise one way vs. bidirectional is unresolved

    WOTA
    Trials Bikes
    32 inch width
    Soft tires (decrease tire pressure, less tread)
    160 pound weight
    52 inch wheel base
    ~75 inch long vehicle
    21 inch rim size
    Not too many kids
    250 cc average (80 – 350 cc range)
    ~20Horsepower
    Not always fact. Spark arrestor (easy to put one on)
    ~5 mph on obstacles, 5-35 mph on trials (not much fun over 40 mph)

    WOHVA
    ~max/16” wheel base length
    60 – 96” width
    Mix (about equal) stock and custom


    6.   Preferred site conditions: size, topography, vegetation, soil types

    WATVA
    Must be over 1000 acres
    1200 acres is NOT large
    Gilbert is the armpit of MN
    Good example = NH park (Peter has a copy of the info on this park) is over 7000 acres with over 131 miles of trails within the park – very good!
    Bigger is better
    Park would be of more value to the ATV riders if the park was hooked up to an existing trail system and access to gas, motels and food

    WOHMA and WOHVA
    Size should be BIG


    7.   Preferred trail features

    WOHVA
    Design for wider crew cabs, e.g. corners
    Some looking for “first time experience” (about 50%)
    Some looking for more “max adventure” (about 50%) Majority of these want rock climbs/challenges
    Majority drive OHV to park/trail (as opposed to trailering)
    Increase difficulty – increase trailering (~60%)
    Rock gardens are good (maybe multiple)
    Spill kits

    WOHMA
    95% of OHMs are trailered
    Want to know rules ahead of time
    ATV and motorcycle trails difficult to share – ruts
    Countour trails OK
    Don’t have to have obstacles
    Lines with more challenge

    W4WDA
    Most folks on trails are OK going slow “have a lot of fun at 3 mph”
    Lots of families, lots of stock vehicles
    Adventure and challenge is better than speed
    All but ATV usually involves scouting

    WOTA
    Stumps are good

    WATVA
    Something is better than nothing
    Variety/change (experiences, terrain, artificial is ok, no roads!)
    Kids areas – like variety, less attention span, safety training area (located near greater trail facilities)


    8.   Preferred user riding experiences

    WATVA
    Families want more structured environment
    “Single guys” won’t necessarily want to go to these places
    Median Age 47-52
    Target audience is dependant upon facility (size, amenities)
    Good signage (wayfinding, level of difficulty)
    Safety training area
    Increase Development – electrical , access to trails, etc.
    Casual experience
    See SVRA (CA) example
    Buffer areas – other (non-primary) uses (hike, etc.)
    Not one size fits all (remember keep in mind)
    Minority scared (WATVA#3) don’t want to lose maintenance $ or like (linear) trails better
    Signage for trail length and trail difficulty
    Length, less than 10 miles no one wants
    Safety and etiquette is important
    Realize mud area versus water areas are different experience
    Manufactured mud area gives an opportunity to evaluate
    Places where people learn the “right thing to do”
    Day use – smaller ok
    Need bigger to occupy users for multiple days
    Day use near populations is OK
    Multiday – further from populations
    Opportunities (if ATV exp. Avail in other places, won’t trailer too far)

    WOTA
    Lean more towards primitive (less equip)
    No user fee info yet.
    Want obstacles, 1 foot tread
    Multiple lines
    Shared desires – obstacles can be same/similar
    Trials could get by with 20 acres

    WOHMA
    Loops versus linear
    Kids areas – like variety, less attention span, safety training area (located near greater trail facilities)

    WOHVA
    Very favorable to registration/sticker program.  Needs to be segregated fund.
    Increase same approach as at Mole Lake
    Vehicle inspection
    Allow folks only on certain trails (guided)
    Lots of folks do like mud areas – best to have managed areas
    Not too difficult
    OHV/OHM there is demand
    Mileage not as important as design
    ATV not as interested in challenges
    OHV and OHM challenges/play area could easily be shared.

    W4WDA
    Two times proposed sticker/registration programs
    Want similar challenges to trails (but wider!)  8 foot tread
    Management by design (obstacles at beginning to weed out)
    Color Code signs


    9.   Desired user amenities

    W4WDA
    Camping at nearby very important hotel w/ multiday facilities
    Young riders underserved
    Want challenge
    Don’t have a lot of disposable income
    Smaller areas ok
    Sufficient parking for trailers, etc.
    Bathroom with showers
    Sound testing
    Shop, etc. for other activities
    Fees: per vehicle instead of per person

    WOTA
    Decent overflow parking

    WOHMA
    Take advantage of amenities in nearby communities (first) access from/to parks.
    OHMs have been using private riding areas
    OK with smaller areas, but not a solution
    Firewood
    Vehicle Wash sites (invasive species removal)
    Fees: per vehicle instead of per person

    WATVA
    Look at existing situations to take advantage of
    Adams/Dyracuse
    Riding area (vs. #1 property size) is what is important
    ATV – need to offer them more (already have a lot)
    UTV – pent up demand
    Less for ATV (e.g. green, blue, black)
    Mix of camping level development
    Pull through sites
    Summer weekday programs, emphasize school age kids
    Ability to clean up after selves
    Shelter, shade
    Fees: per vehicle instead of per person

    WOHVA
    Fees: $15/20 a day or $100/yr or statewide (state facility)
    Fees: per vehicle instead of per person

    DNR
    OHV Park Guidelines overall, attendees feel these are good
    Most underserved (Mark A) OHM trail riders, OHV riders, family ATVers – My intention for asking this question was to try to get at the question of who are the primary groups who currently have the fewest recreational opportunities, so we can take them into consideration when coming up with the MSRA proposal.  I think having a solid understanding and agreement on which groups have the fewest current opportunities combined with which groups have the most users who will want to recreate at a well executed MSRA are key pieces of information that we need to have as we proceed.  We need to keep asking these questions as we proceed. (Mark Aquino)
    All knowledgeable, user ranger/enforcement
    Fees/rules – Users willing to pay for quality. No alcohol while riding (standard rules e.g. public intoxication), Hours.


    We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.
    Aldo Leopold
View as RSS news feed in XML